The Indian constitution is more significant and a part of the whole sphere and base in which India stands. The critics have assembled their line of work and sourced out various criticism, which is based on the constituent assembly and the draft, which was made through the same source and wave. Talking about the central part of the blame, here is something which lies onto the same. Well, there are following things which are pointed out as the source of the criticism, and here they are.
Criticism pointed out by the critics on the Indian assembly & constitution:
- India is not a representative body and not a social head
When it comes to the source of representation, then India is not shown as a representative body. This is the prime criticism which was marked onto by the Indian assembly. The critics have always argued that the constituent entity of Indian is not representation, and its affiliates were not directly elected by the people of India as well. On the basis of the adult franchise and universal law and code of conduct, which was passed onto when drafting during the report, this was made, and it came out as a sharp criticism.
- Not a Sovereign body
The critics have always sourced out that the maintained of the Constituent Assembly that has not declared India as a sovereign body and altogether. This is because they have created a proposal on the basis of the British Government and that they are the assembly main head and function. On the permission which was set in by the British Government, some of the Indian services and constituent functions are set up and lessoned on so that they are the scope through which the criticism lies as a sharp point on the basis of the assembly.
- Time-consuming method
One of the main criticism which has been faced by the assembly is the sourced that the whole network is slow and the leading ways through which it is drafted, it could have been dull in a variety orbit which could have been laid into pieces. But according to the critics, it has been said that the constituent assembly took an unduly long time to make, and the constitution was drafted after so many days. But the American Constitution, on the other hand, took about four months of written work and insight.
- Dominated by the lead of Congress
Another prime source of the Congress and the constitution of India is that it is governed by the lead work of Congress. This means that the critics have charged that the main lead and the framework of the whole criticism is based on the point that it is mainly resourceful to the congress body. It is a one-party country, and there is no discrimination for the said. This was the main criticism that was faced by the whole of the Indian body and the constituent assembly when the first drafts were made.
- Lawyer Politician Domination of the society
One of the leading critics of the Indian assembly and consistency was that it is a part of the community where the lead is gone to the politician and the lawyers mainly. It is also maintained by the critics that the city is primarily dominated by their source, and the whole assembly was focussed on their part. This, to them, is the main reason for the dense matter for the constituent assembly and the language as well as the leading business through which it can be sourced out to the rest of the group.
- Dominated by the Hindus
When the assembly was drafted, then it was shown that the whole consistency was developed on the basis of the majority section and ruling of Hindus. And this is why people said that it was a Hindu dominated society as a whole.
These are the leading ways and processes through which the Indian assembly and the reports are drafted. It is the source and the function through which the main criticism of the references was made, and this is when the critics were sourced out. And most of the critics are revolved around the Indian assembly as a whole.